IVC Filter Cases Continue to Move Forward

Currently, there are more than 10,000 IVC filter cases filed across the country, in state and federal courts, with a majority being filed against manufacturers, Bard Medical and Cook Medical. IVC filters are small devices surgically implanted into the inferior vena cava in an effort to catch blood clots (where they should naturally dissolve) before they travel to the lungs, causing a potentially fatal pulmonary embolism. The Bard MDL (multidistrict litigation) is venued in the District of Arizona, while the Cook MDL is venued in the Southern District of Indiana. Additionally, lawsuits are being filed against Boston Scientific for its Greenfield Vena Cava Filter in Ohio; as well as Rex Medical and Argon Medical for their Option and Option Elite IVC Filters in Pennsylvania.

Recently, an Indiana jury awarded $3 million dollars to a plaintiff after a month-long trial, finding that a Cook Celect IVC blood clot filter was defective. The jury declined to award punitive damages. This was the third bellwether trial, and the first plaintiff win, in the Cook IVC MDL. The jury in the first bellwether trial found for defendant, while the Judge dismissed the second bellwether trial on summary judgement, concluding that the case was time-barred. However, a Texas jury awarded a plaintiff $1.2 million in 2018 in a failure to warn case. Currently, there are more than 5,000 cases filed against Cook.

Meanwhile, Bard Medical was ordered to pay $3.6 million to a plaintiff in the first Bard MDL bellwether trial in 2018. The second bellwether trial resulted in a defense win just a few months later. A third, and currently final, bellwether trial will take place in May 2019, which involves the Bard Recovery Filter. Judge Campbell, who is overseeing the Bard MDL, has indicated an intention to likely remand the cases in the MDL to their original districts, if a settlement is not reached, following the upcoming bellwether trial. Over 3,500 cases have been filed against Bard.

READ  Aspartame: Decades of Science Point to Serious Health Risks

As previously discussed, a bellwether trial is meant to serve as a test case, commonly in MDLs, as it would be impractical and costly to try every case for trial. The result of the bellwether trials is expected to shape the process by which to resolve the remaining cases in the MDL. For instance, if several bellwether trials result in large verdicts, defendant(s) may be more inclined to settle the remaining cases, so as to avoid additional legal expenses. Alternatively, if multiple bellwether trials end in defense wins, defendants may choose to continue to litigate the cases, or they may extend lower settlement offers for the remaining cases.

Spread the love

Author: Edward Lott

Edward Lott, Ph.D., M.B.A. is President and Managing Partner of Allentown-based ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc., a client acquisition company that offers attorneys signed client cases.Ed has been a digital entrepreneur since 1994, having discovered very early the opportunities the Internet offered. After having spent over two decades helping small business owners, Ed joined the staff of ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing as President and Managing Partner, where he is expanding the agency's cutting-edge services.A true marketing futurist, Ed's vast experience working directly with attorneys has given him a unique perspective on law firm marketing not found in many other digital marketing agencies. Ed has reshaped the offerings of ForLawFirmsOnly to focus on growing law firms through a holistic approach to digital marketing evident in the reformulated lead generation processes now in place. He is taking that same holistic approach for small businesses, helping them grow their bottom line.Want to learn more about ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, our client acquistion services or lead generation programs, or just talk to Ed about his visions for helping your business grow? Call him at 855-943-8736.

Copyright ©2021 Medical Injury Help, ForLawFirmsOnly Marketing, Inc. All Rights Reserved